In a captivating interview on “The Megyn Kelly Show,” the former Fox News anchor did not hold back in her assessment of Hollywood icon Robert De Niro’s political activism. Recalling an exclusive interview where De Niro openly criticized former President Trump during the 2016 election, Kelly questioned the effectiveness of the actor’s efforts, arguing that his strong partisan stance over the years has made him an ineffective choice for such a politically charged event.
Robert De Niro, renowned for his acting prowess, has in recent years become increasingly vocal about his political beliefs. During the 2016 presidential election, the actor made headlines when he appeared on Megyn Kelly’s show and unleashed a scathing rant against then-candidate Trump.
“It was the first time he’d really come out and said how he felt about politics,” Kelly recalled. “And we broke that on my show, when he ran against Hillary.”
However, Kelly pointed out that despite De Niro’s vocal criticism, it did not prevent Trump’s eventual victory. “So if he couldn’t make any change in 2016 why does he think he can do it now?” she asked, suggesting that the actor’s political activism may be doing more harm than good.
Megyn Kelly’s comments highlight a broader issue in the world of celebrity politics. While A-list actors and musicians often use their platforms to advocate for various causes, the effectiveness of their efforts is often called into question.
“If you’re going to send somebody to go speak there, make it someone who is universally beloved,” Kelly argued. “Robert De Niro has gone so hard partisan for the past eight years he is like the number one example of Trump derangement syndrome.”
The notion that celebrity endorsements and political activism can sway the electorate has been a subject of much debate. While some studies have suggested that celebrity influence can have a measurable impact, others have found that the effect is often limited or even counterproductive.
Megyn Kelly’s scathing critique of Robert De Niro’s political activism highlights the ongoing tension between the entertainment industry and the political sphere. As celebrities increasingly use their platforms to voice their political views, the question of their legitimacy and influence has become a matter of intense scrutiny.
“It’s so stupid it was colossally stupid,” Kelly said of De Niro’s recent press conference expressing his fears about Trump’s potential to cause widespread destruction. “Robert De Niro has gone so hard partisan for the past eight years he is like the number one example of Trump derangement syndrome.”
Kelly’s remarks underscore the notion that while celebrities may have a platform, their effectiveness in shaping political discourse is often limited. The public’s appetite for celebrity-driven political activism appears to be waning, with many viewers and voters seeking more nuanced and objective analysis from trusted sources.
Megyn Kelly’s assessment of Robert De Niro’s political activism is likely to have a lasting impact on the discourse surrounding celebrity involvement in politics. By challenging the actor’s credibility and effectiveness, she has raised important questions about the role of celebrity voices in shaping public opinion and influencing the political landscape.
“It’s so stupid it was colossally stupid,” Kelly said of De Niro’s recent press conference. “If you’re going to send somebody to go speak there, make it someone who is universally beloved.”
As the debate over the intersection of entertainment and politics continues, Megyn Kelly’s critique of Robert De Niro’s activism is a reminder that even the most famous and influential celebrities may not always be the most effective messengers for political change.
Megyn Kelly’s scathing assessment of Robert De Niro’s political activism has sparked a larger conversation about the limits of celebrity influence in the political sphere. While the actor’s vocal criticism of former President Trump has made headlines, Kelly argues that his strong partisan stance has undermined his credibility and effectiveness as a messenger for political change.
As the public increasingly seeks more nuanced and objective analysis from trusted sources, the role of celebrity voices in shaping political discourse has come under intense scrutiny. Megyn Kelly’s critique of De Niro’s activism serves as a reminder that even the most famous and influential celebrities may not always be the most effective advocates for political causes.
